BizGapMap

Home / Family clothing stores / Texas / Galveston County, TX

Galveston County, TX — Clothing stores Saturation

How many clothing stores exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 22 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Family clothing stores · General apparel shops. Counted together because official statistics use one 448140 code.

Measured density: High density — 1.55× the U.S. rate (between 1.55× and 2.28× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 15 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 11 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

Range spans the U.S. rate   Galveston County clothing stores — 155–228% of the U.S. rate

49 clothing stores are counted in Galveston County — 1.1 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 155% of the U.S. rate of 0.7.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has stayed roughly flat between 2015 and 2023 (40 → 41).

Measured supply density is highest in 77591 (Texas City), 77546 (Friendswood), 77565 (Kemah) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 77539 (Dickinson), 77551 (Galveston), 77590 (Texas City).

Census County Business Patterns (2023) puts the county-wide count at 35 establishments, including locations in ZIP codes that do not map to a ZCTA — so it can run slightly above the sum of the ZIP rows on this page. It is annual, so it lags more than QCEW.

Measured density: Galveston County sits at 155% of the U.S. rate for clothing stores. 11 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 155% and 228% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 77591 and 77546; the lowest measured density is in 77539 and 77551.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing clothing stores and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Clothing stores
49–79
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (15 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
1.1
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
0.7
per 10,000 present
County index
1.55×
vs. U.S.
Latest year (CBP)
35
2023 — $15M annual payroll
Residents
379,923
17 ZIPs with data
Workers
101,205
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
367,407
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
+4.5%
+15,801 people
Net migration 2024
+4,185
international +1,425, domestic +2,760
Jobs located here
116,970
LODES 2022, +5.6% since 2019

Galveston County had an estimated 367,407 residents on July 1, 2024 — 4.5% more than in 2020 (+15,801). In the latest year it gained 4,821 people: births minus deaths +642, international migration +1,425, domestic migration +2,760. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

116,970 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (+5.6% since 2019), and 160,354 employed residents lived there (+4.3% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
77568 La Marque
+47.2%
77591 Texas City
+22.5%
77554 Galveston
+21.7%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change

No ZIP had a statistically significant decrease.

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses

Not shown. Census now groups clothing with clothing accessories (NAICS 45811); a family-clothing-only nonemployer count is not published.

Census Nonemployer Statistics 2024 (NAICS 2022). We do not approximate this figure.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more clothing stores in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — up 2% since 2015

Number of clothing stores in Galveston County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

40
2015
40
2018
42
2020
38
2021
37
2022
41
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
77591 Texas City
858%
77546 Friendswood
462%
77565 Kemah
439%
77590 Texas City
201%
77551 Galveston
176%
77539 Dickinson
83%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
77539 Dickinson
83%
77551 Galveston
176%
77590 Texas City
201%
77565 Kemah
439%
77546 Friendswood
462%
77591 Texas City
858%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few clothing stores may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

Employment hubs & destinations

These ZIPs have far more workers (or visitors) than residents, so their counts are driven by daytime and visitor demand — not a place to read "shortage" from resident numbers alone.

ZIPNeighborhoodType ResidentsWorkersClothing storesIndex
77555Galveston Destination 27,742 0–2 —

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = clothing stores per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersClothing stores Per 10kIndexStatus
77591Texas City 18,2943,887 12 5.9 858% Very high density
77546Friendswood 54,78915,565 20 3.2 462% Very high density
77565Kemah 6,9435,892 3 3.0 439% Very high density
77590Texas City 31,6428,857 5 1.4 201% High density
77551Galveston 21,6966,054 3 1.2 176% High density
77539Dickinson 49,3756,409 3 0.6 83% Below average
77510Santa Fe 14,1551,842 0–2 — — Not published
77517Santa Fe 5,529389 0–2 — — Not published
77518Bacliff 9,541756 0–2 — — Not published
77549Friendswood —552 0–2 — — Not published
77550Galveston 23,48911,252 0–2 — — Not published
77552Galveston —312 0–2 — — Not published
77553Galveston —291 0–2 — — Not published
77554Galveston 10,4144,871 0–2 — — Not published
77555Galveston 27,742 0–2 — — Not published
77563Hitchcock 9,955943 0–2 — — Not published
77568La Marque 23,0834,037 0–2 — — Not published
77573League City 98,10922,062 0–2 — — Not published
77574League City —59 0–2 — — Not published
77592Texas City —968 3 — — Not published
77623High Island 58517 0–2 — — Not published
77650Port Bolivar 2,322630 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in League City

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse League City retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse League City retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse League City retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Galveston County and clothing stores

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 448140 — family clothing stores. Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. This industry has no clean QCEW series, so the freshest county signal is Census County Business Patterns 2023: 35 establishments and $15M in annual payroll county-wide. This count includes locations in ZIP codes that do not map to a ZCTA, so it can be slightly higher than the sum of the ZIP rows. CBP is annual and slower than QCEW. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (0.69 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.