BizGapMap

Home / Convenience stores / South Carolina / Richland County, SC

Richland County, SC — Convenience stores Saturation

How many convenience stores exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 30 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Convenience stores · Corner stores · Small-format food & fuel marts. Counted together because official statistics use one 445120 code.

Measured density: Range spans bands — 1.16× the U.S. rate (between 1.16× and 1.51× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 21 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 8 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

Above the U.S. rate   Richland County convenience stores — 116–151% of the U.S. rate

52 convenience stores are counted in Richland County — 1.1 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 116% of the U.S. rate of 0.9.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has risen 48% between 2015 and 2023 (25 → 37). That set is smaller than today's county total. 2020–2021 were pandemic-distorted, and Census rounds counts, so small moves are within noise.

Measured supply density is highest in 29223 (Columbia), 29204 (Columbia), 29203 (Columbia) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 29201 (Columbia), 29209 (Columbia), 29210 (Columbia).

Census County Business Patterns (2023) puts the county-wide count at 56 establishments, including locations in ZIP codes that do not map to a ZCTA — so it can run slightly above the sum of the ZIP rows on this page. It is annual, so it lags more than QCEW.

Measured density: Richland County sits at 116% of the U.S. rate for convenience stores. 8 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 116% and 151% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 29223 and 29204; the lowest measured density is in 29201 and 29209.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing convenience stores and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Convenience stores
52–94
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (21 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
1.1
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
0.9
per 10,000 present
County index
1.16×
vs. U.S.
Latest year (CBP)
56
2023 — $3M annual payroll
Residents
407,162
17 ZIPs with data
Workers
169,126
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
430,651
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
+3.6%
+14,954 people
Net migration 2024
+4,459
international +2,110, domestic +2,349
Jobs located here
229,974
LODES 2022, +5.5% since 2019

Richland County had an estimated 430,651 residents on July 1, 2024 — 3.6% more than in 2020 (+14,954). In the latest year it gained 5,415 people: births minus deaths +952, international migration +2,110, domestic migration +2,349. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

229,974 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (+5.5% since 2019), and 168,836 employed residents lived there (+2.9% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
29016 Blythewood
+42.4%
29201 Columbia
+18.3%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
29207 Columbia
−34.7%

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses

Not shown. Census publishes convenience stores only combined with vending machine operators, so a convenience-only nonemployer count is not published.

Census Nonemployer Statistics 2024 (NAICS 2022). We do not approximate this figure.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more convenience stores in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — up 48% since 2015

Number of convenience stores in Richland County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

25
2015
32
2018
34
2020
38
2021
42
2022
37
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
29223 Columbia
255%
29204 Columbia
201%
29203 Columbia
187%
29205 Columbia
158%
29206 Columbia
143%
29210 Columbia
124%
29209 Columbia
120%
29201 Columbia
79%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
29201 Columbia
79%
29209 Columbia
120%
29210 Columbia
124%
29206 Columbia
143%
29205 Columbia
158%
29203 Columbia
187%
29204 Columbia
201%
29223 Columbia
255%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few convenience stores may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = convenience stores per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersConvenience stores Per 10kIndexStatus
29044Eastover 4,7991,260 4 7.4 806% Very high density
29223Columbia 53,07414,142 14 2.3 255% Very high density
29204Columbia 18,1597,164 4 1.8 201% High density
29203Columbia 40,65324,261 9 1.7 187% High density
29205Columbia 22,22310,814 4 1.4 158% High density
29206Columbia 19,7596,554 3 1.3 143% Above average
29210Columbia 39,96225,725 6 1.1 124% Above average
29209Columbia 38,04115,181 5 1.1 120% Above average
29201Columbia 24,60533,650 3 0.7 79% Below average
29002Ballentine —145 0–2 — — Not published
29016Blythewood 30,4545,709 0–2 — — Not published
29052Gadsden 2,19953 0–2 — — Not published
29061Hopkins 12,5382,237 0–2 — — Not published
29063Irmo 38,2019,828 0–2 — — Not published
29177White Rock 177352 0–2 — — Not published
29202Columbia —2,237 0–2 — — Not published
29207Columbia 8,0121,944 0–2 — — Not published
29208Columbia 2,445552 0–2 — — Not published
29211Columbia —25 0–2 — — Not published
29219Columbia —154 0–2 — — Not published
29220Columbia —5,235 0–2 — — Not published
29221Columbia —121 0–2 — — Not published
29224Columbia —66 0–2 — — Not published
29226Columbia —9 0–2 — — Not published
29229Columbia 51,8619,700 0–2 — — Not published
29230Columbia —22 0–2 — — Not published
29240Columbia —58 0–2 — — Not published
29250Columbia —85 0–2 — — Not published
29260Columbia —15 0–2 — — Not published
29290Columbia —53 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Columbia

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Columbia retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Columbia retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Columbia retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Richland County and convenience stores

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 445120 — convenience retailers. Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. This industry has no clean QCEW series, so the freshest county signal is Census County Business Patterns 2023: 56 establishments and $3M in annual payroll county-wide. This count includes locations in ZIP codes that do not map to a ZCTA, so it can be slightly higher than the sum of the ZIP rows. CBP is annual and slower than QCEW. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (0.91 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.