BizGapMap

Home / Limited-service restaurants (fast food) / Alabama / Jefferson County, AL

Jefferson County, AL — Fast food Saturation

How many fast food exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 69 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Fast food · Quick-service restaurants · Takeout & delivery counters · Pizza delivery · Sandwich & burger chains. Counted together because official statistics use one 722513 code.

Measured density: Above average — 1.29× the U.S. rate (between 1.29× and 1.34× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 30 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 15 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

Above the U.S. rate   Jefferson County fast food — 129–134% of the U.S. rate

767 fast food are counted in Jefferson County — 8.6 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 129% of the U.S. rate of 6.7.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has risen 13% between 2015 and 2023 (671 → 761). That set is smaller than today's county total. 2020–2021 were pandemic-distorted, and Census rounds counts, so small moves are within noise.

Measured supply density is highest in 35068 (Fultondale), 35071 (Gardendale), 35210 (Birmingham) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 35111 (Mc Calla), 35127 (Pleasant Grove), 35218 (Birmingham).

BLS QCEW puts the latest county-wide count (2026 Q1) at 818 establishments, the freshest available signal.

Measured density: Jefferson County sits at 129% of the U.S. rate for fast food. 15 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 129% and 134% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 35068 and 35071; the lowest measured density is in 35111 and 35127.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing fast food and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Fast food
767–827
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (30 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
8.6
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
6.7
per 10,000 present
County index
1.29×
vs. U.S.
Latest quarter (QCEW)
818
2026 Q1 — county total
Residents
711,294
53 ZIPs with data
Workers
355,228
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
664,744
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
−1.5%
−9,983 people
Net migration 2024
+453
international +2,392, domestic −1,939
Jobs located here
380,425
LODES 2022, +0.7% since 2019

Jefferson County had an estimated 664,744 residents on July 1, 2024 — 1.5% fewer than in 2020 (−9,983). In the latest year it gained 660 people: births minus deaths +208, international migration +2,392, domestic migration −1,939. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

380,425 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (+0.7% since 2019), and 278,008 employed residents lived there (−3.3% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
35091 Kimberly
+21.9%
35244 Birmingham
+19.6%
35209 Birmingham
+15.9%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
35064 Fairfield
−10.6%
35215 Birmingham
−9.8%
35127 Pleasant Grove
−2.2%

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses (no paid employees)

Nonemployer businesses
125
no paid employees (2024)
Receipts
$8.0M
published gross receipts
Receipts per business
$64K
gross, not profit

Census Nonemployer Statistics counts businesses with no paid employees — a separate universe from the employer establishments counted above; a business is in one or the other, never both. They are not storefronts by definition: many are home-based, mobile, or part-time.

We show them beside the density index, not inside it. In categories such as nail and beauty salons, child care, and pet care, one-person businesses can outnumber employer establishments, so the employer-only count understates how many businesses exist. That is not evidence of higher demand.

Receipts are gross revenue reported for these businesses — not profit, and not the size of the local market. Census publishes this only at county level, so it is not shown on the ZIP map. See methodology.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more fast food in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — up 13% since 2015

Number of fast food in Jefferson County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

671
2015
724
2018
702
2020
700
2021
722
2022
761
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
35068 Fultondale
266%
35071 Gardendale
211%
35210 Birmingham
195%
35209 Birmingham
194%
35094 Leeds
189%
35244 Birmingham
186%
35208 Birmingham
181%
35243 Birmingham
178%
35023 Bessemer
164%
35216 Birmingham
164%
35064 Fairfield
148%
35214 Birmingham
143%
35235 Birmingham
142%
35204 Birmingham
138%
35173 Trussville
135%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
35111 Mc Calla
38%
35127 Pleasant Grove
46%
35218 Birmingham
58%
35226 Birmingham
62%
35211 Birmingham
75%
35212 Birmingham
75%
35126 Pinson
77%
35217 Birmingham
79%
35062 Dora
81%
35222 Birmingham
83%
35213 Birmingham
88%
35005 Adamsville
89%
35206 Birmingham
90%
35180 Warrior
97%
35215 Birmingham
107%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few fast food may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

Employment hubs & destinations

These ZIPs have far more workers (or visitors) than residents, so their counts are driven by daytime and visitor demand — not a place to read "shortage" from resident numbers alone.

ZIPNeighborhoodType ResidentsWorkersFast foodIndex
35233Birmingham Destination 3,57036,512 39 268%
35203Birmingham Employment hub 3,50629,248 26 215%
35249Birmingham Employment hub 1551 0–2 —

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = fast food per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersFast food Per 10kIndexStatus
35233Birmingham 3,57036,512 39 17.9 268% Very high density
35068Fultondale 8,3782,439 17 17.7 266% Very high density
35234Birmingham 3,8793,699 9 15.7 235% High density
35203Birmingham 3,50629,248 26 14.3 215% High density
35071Gardendale 17,2885,300 28 14.0 211% High density
35210Birmingham 13,77515,432 28 13.0 195% High density
35209Birmingham 32,73439,607 68 12.9 194% High density
35094Leeds 14,8545,191 22 12.6 189% High density
35244Birmingham 38,21730,005 66 12.4 186% High density
35208Birmingham 13,4121,322 17 12.1 181% High density
35243Birmingham 18,17624,309 36 11.9 178% High density
35023Bessemer 25,5335,433 31 11.0 164% High density
35216Birmingham 34,32713,422 45 11.0 164% High density
35064Fairfield 9,8722,550 11 9.9 148% Above average
35214Birmingham 17,0273,756 18 9.5 143% Above average
35235Birmingham 20,5269,771 24 9.4 142% Above average
35204Birmingham 8,9533,831 10 9.2 138% Above average
35173Trussville 31,6037,699 32 9.0 135% Above average
35020Bessemer 24,8925,904 24 8.6 129% Above average
35228Birmingham 10,216813 9 8.5 127% Above average
35022Bessemer 23,12611,524 23 8.0 119% Above average
35223Birmingham 10,6668,773 11 7.3 110% Above average
35205Birmingham 18,85812,585 18 7.2 107% Above average
35215Birmingham 43,9037,770 34 7.1 107% Above average
35180Warrior 12,9731,855 9 6.5 97% Below average
35206Birmingham 15,6212,069 10 6.0 90% Below average
35005Adamsville 8,247427 5 5.9 89% Below average
35213Birmingham 15,6036,088 11 5.9 88% Below average
35222Birmingham 8,3618,483 7 5.6 83% Below average
35062Dora 8,864667 5 5.4 81% Below average
35217Birmingham 12,2409,765 9 5.3 79% Below average
35126Pinson 22,5991,678 12 5.1 77% Below average
35212Birmingham 10,1603,522 6 5.0 75% Below average
35211Birmingham 24,92410,422 15 5.0 75% Below average
35226Birmingham 38,5884,807 17 4.1 62% Below average
35218Birmingham 6,9811,470 3 3.9 58% Below average
35127Pleasant Grove 9,442575 3 3.1 46% Far below average
35111Mc Calla 20,3426,161 6 2.6 38% Far below average
35006Adger 3,894550 0–2 — — Not published
35021Bessemer —214 0–2 — — Not published
35048Clay —21 0–2 — — Not published
35060Docena 15865 0–2 — — Not published
35061Dolomite 1,554209 0–2 — — Not published
35073Graysville 3,031346 0–2 — — Not published
35091Kimberly 3,802248 0–2 — — Not published
35116Morris 5,227347 0–2 — — Not published
35117Mount Olive 5,606299 0–2 — — Not published
35118Mulga 2,960223 0–2 — — Not published
35119New Castle 06 0–2 — — Not published
35142Shannon —8 0–2 — — Not published
35172Trafford 2,703258 0–2 — — Not published
35201Birmingham —557 0–2 — — Not published
35202Birmingham —193 0–2 — — Not published
35207Birmingham 7,7094,006 0–2 — — Not published
35219Birmingham —39 0–2 — — Not published
35221Birmingham 3,119590 0–2 — — Not published
35224Birmingham 4,739508 0–2 — — Not published
35229Birmingham 2,7922,215 0–2 — — Not published
35231Birmingham —21 0–2 — — Not published
35232Birmingham —186 0–2 — — Not published
35236Birmingham —111 0–2 — — Not published
35249Birmingham 1551 0–2 — — Not published
35253Birmingham —98 0–2 — — Not published
35254Birmingham 1,749429 0–2 — — Not published
35255Birmingham —48 0–2 — — Not published
35259Birmingham —19 0–2 — — Not published
35266Birmingham —154 0–2 — — Not published
35285Birmingham —10 0–2 — — Not published
35294Birmingham —243 3 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Birmingham

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Birmingham retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Birmingham retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Birmingham retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Jefferson County and fast food

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 722513 — limited-service restaurants. Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. BLS QCEW (quarterly) is newer than ZBP — 2026 Q1 shows 818 establishments county-wide for this industry. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (6.67 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.