BizGapMap

Home / Limited-service restaurants (fast food) / Alabama / Mobile County, AL

Mobile County, AL — Fast food Saturation

How many fast food exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 47 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Fast food · Quick-service restaurants · Takeout & delivery counters · Pizza delivery · Sandwich & burger chains. Counted together because official statistics use one 722513 code.

Measured density: Above average — 1.04× the U.S. rate (between 1.04× and 1.14× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 26 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 15 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

In line with the U.S. rate   Mobile County fast food — 104–114% of the U.S. rate

341 fast food are counted in Mobile County — 7.0 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 104% of the U.S. rate of 6.7.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has risen 27% between 2015 and 2023 (263 → 334). That set is smaller than today's county total. 2020–2021 were pandemic-distorted, and Census rounds counts, so small moves are within noise.

Measured supply density is highest in 36571 (Saraland), 36607 (Mobile), 36606 (Mobile) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 36693 (Mobile), 36605 (Mobile), 36617 (Mobile).

BLS QCEW puts the latest county-wide count (2026 Q1) at 386 establishments, the freshest available signal.

Measured density: Mobile County sits at 104% of the U.S. rate for fast food. 15 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 104% and 114% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 36571 and 36607; the lowest measured density is in 36693 and 36605.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing fast food and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Fast food
341–393
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (26 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
7.0
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
6.7
per 10,000 present
County index
1.04×
vs. U.S.
Latest quarter (QCEW)
386
2026 Q1 — county total
Residents
412,817
36 ZIPs with data
Workers
152,918
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
412,339
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
−0.5%
−2,070 people
Net migration 2024
+246
international +762, domestic −516
Jobs located here
177,002
LODES 2022, +0.3% since 2019

Mobile County had an estimated 412,339 residents on July 1, 2024 — 0.5% fewer than in 2020 (−2,070). In the latest year it gained 594 people: births minus deaths +355, international migration +762, domestic migration −516. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

177,002 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (+0.3% since 2019), and 167,794 employed residents lived there (−1.3% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
36572 Satsuma
+12.4%
36571 Saraland
+10.8%
36611 Mobile
+8.9%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
36617 Mobile
−16.4%

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses (no paid employees)

Nonemployer businesses
51
no paid employees (2024)
Receipts
$3.3M
published gross receipts
Receipts per business
$65K
gross, not profit

Census Nonemployer Statistics counts businesses with no paid employees — a separate universe from the employer establishments counted above; a business is in one or the other, never both. They are not storefronts by definition: many are home-based, mobile, or part-time.

We show them beside the density index, not inside it. In categories such as nail and beauty salons, child care, and pet care, one-person businesses can outnumber employer establishments, so the employer-only count understates how many businesses exist. That is not evidence of higher demand.

Receipts are gross revenue reported for these businesses — not profit, and not the size of the local market. Census publishes this only at county level, so it is not shown on the ZIP map. See methodology.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more fast food in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — up 27% since 2015

Number of fast food in Mobile County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

263
2015
283
2018
304
2020
314
2021
325
2022
334
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
36571 Saraland
207%
36607 Mobile
200%
36606 Mobile
200%
36608 Mobile
188%
36619 Mobile
187%
36604 Mobile
156%
36618 Mobile
148%
36609 Mobile
121%
36522 Citronelle
119%
36695 Mobile
87%
36611 Mobile
87%
36582 Theodore
75%
36541 Grand Bay
74%
36575 Semmes
66%
36617 Mobile
65%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
36693 Mobile
41%
36605 Mobile
51%
36617 Mobile
65%
36575 Semmes
66%
36541 Grand Bay
74%
36582 Theodore
75%
36611 Mobile
87%
36695 Mobile
87%
36522 Citronelle
119%
36609 Mobile
121%
36618 Mobile
148%
36604 Mobile
156%
36619 Mobile
187%
36608 Mobile
188%
36606 Mobile
200%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few fast food may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

Employment hubs & destinations

These ZIPs have far more workers (or visitors) than residents, so their counts are driven by daytime and visitor demand — not a place to read "shortage" from resident numbers alone.

ZIPNeighborhoodType ResidentsWorkersFast foodIndex
36602Mobile Destination 1,04311,719 14 304%
36505Axis Employment hub 7621,864 0–2 —
36512Bucks Destination 7552 0–2 —
36652Mobile Destination 53899 0–2 —

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = fast food per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersFast food Per 10kIndexStatus
36509Bayou La Batre 1,2331,053 5 28.4 426% Very high density
36602Mobile 1,04311,719 14 20.3 304% Very high density
36612Mobile 3,2741,589 8 19.7 295% Very high density
36528Dauphin Island 1,852518 3 14.2 213% High density
36571Saraland 17,1436,268 28 13.8 207% High density
36607Mobile 5,39310,160 14 13.4 200% High density
36606Mobile 18,72813,593 34 13.3 200% High density
36608Mobile 38,89019,383 61 12.6 188% High density
36619Mobile 14,6975,823 22 12.5 187% High density
36604Mobile 8,8363,533 11 10.4 156% High density
36618Mobile 17,8922,775 19 9.9 148% Above average
36609Mobile 23,8209,506 23 8.0 121% Above average
36522Citronelle 7,116911 6 7.9 119% Above average
36695Mobile 52,69012,055 34 5.8 87% Below average
36611Mobile 6,3321,170 4 5.8 87% Below average
36582Theodore 23,70512,403 15 5.0 75% Below average
36541Grand Bay 15,5901,188 8 4.9 74% Below average
36575Semmes 23,4813,048 11 4.4 66% Below average
36617Mobile 11,1285,358 6 4.3 65% Below average
36605Mobile 25,1042,274 9 3.4 51% Below average
36693Mobile 18,7266,817 6 2.7 41% Far below average
36505Axis 7621,864 0–2 — — Not published
36512Bucks 7552 0–2 — — Not published
36521Chunchula 5,536406 0–2 — — Not published
36523Coden 2,972576 0–2 — — Not published
36525Creola 1,9452,185 0–2 — — Not published
36544Irvington 10,5216,403 0–2 — — Not published
36560Mount Vernon 2,858255 0–2 — — Not published
36568Saint Elmo 21344 0–2 — — Not published
36572Satsuma 6,9221,044 0–2 — — Not published
36587Wilmer 12,013696 0–2 — — Not published
36590Theodore —132 0–2 — — Not published
36601Mobile —118 0–2 — — Not published
36603Mobile 7,7602,547 0–2 — — Not published
36610Mobile 9,8772,527 0–2 — — Not published
36613Eight Mile 12,2341,557 0–2 — — Not published
36615Mobile 03,673 0–2 — — Not published
36616Mobile —131 0–2 — — Not published
36633Mobile —29 0–2 — — Not published
36652Mobile 53899 0–2 — — Not published
36660Mobile —20 0–2 — — Not published
36670Mobile —83 0–2 — — Not published
36671Mobile —40 0–2 — — Not published
36685Mobile —165 0–2 — — Not published
36688Mobile 2,471219 0–2 — — Not published
36689Mobile —13 0–2 — — Not published
36691Mobile —434 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Mobile

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Mobile retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Mobile retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Mobile retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Mobile County and fast food

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 722513 — limited-service restaurants. Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. BLS QCEW (quarterly) is newer than ZBP — 2026 Q1 shows 386 establishments county-wide for this industry. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (6.67 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.