BizGapMap

Home / Fitness & recreational sports centers / Florida / Broward County, FL

Broward County, FL — Gyms Saturation

How many gyms exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 82 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Gyms & fitness centers · CrossFit boxes · Boxing, martial arts & dance studios · Recreational sports centers. Counted together because official statistics use one 713940 code.

Measured density: Above average — 1.08× the U.S. rate (between 1.08× and 1.19× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 42 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 13 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

Range spans the U.S. rate   Broward County gyms — 108–119% of the U.S. rate

263 gyms are counted in Broward County — 1.1 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 108% of the U.S. rate of 1.0.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has risen 38% between 2015 and 2023 (165 → 227). That set is smaller than today's county total. 2020–2021 were pandemic-distorted, and Census rounds counts, so small moves are within noise.

Measured supply density is highest in 33073 (Pompano Beach), 33326 (Fort Lauderdale), 33304 (Fort Lauderdale) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 33311 (Fort Lauderdale), 33068 (Pompano Beach), 33321 (Fort Lauderdale).

BLS QCEW puts the latest county-wide count (2026 Q1) at 331 establishments, the freshest available signal.

Measured density: Broward County sits at 108% of the U.S. rate for gyms. 13 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 108% and 119% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 33073 and 33326; the lowest measured density is in 33311 and 33068.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing gyms and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Gyms
263–347
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (42 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
1.1
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
1.0
per 10,000 present
County index
1.08×
vs. U.S.
Latest quarter (QCEW)
331
2026 Q1 — county total
Residents
1,977,129
53 ZIPs with data
Workers
774,635
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
2,037,472
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
+4.8%
+93,975 people
Net migration 2024
+30,228
international +56,567, domestic −26,339
Jobs located here
870,923
LODES 2022, +2.8% since 2019

Broward County had an estimated 2,037,472 residents on July 1, 2024 — 4.8% more than in 2020 (+93,975). In the latest year it gained 34,686 people: births minus deaths +4,513, international migration +56,567, domestic migration −26,339. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

870,923 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (+2.8% since 2019), and 872,807 employed residents lived there (+1.1% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
33301 Fort Lauderdale
+30.1%
33316 Fort Lauderdale
+27.7%
33319 Fort Lauderdale
+16.4%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change

No ZIP had a statistically significant decrease.

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses

Not shown. NES 2024 does not publish fitness and recreational sports centers (NAICS 71394); only the broader recreation group (7139) is available.

Census Nonemployer Statistics 2024 (NAICS 2022). We do not approximate this figure.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more gyms in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — up 38% since 2015

Number of gyms in Broward County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

165
2015
205
2018
215
2020
228
2021
240
2022
227
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
33073 Pompano Beach
364%
33326 Fort Lauderdale
334%
33304 Fort Lauderdale
318%
33324 Fort Lauderdale
315%
33305 Fort Lauderdale
310%
33062 Pompano Beach
260%
33301 Fort Lauderdale
243%
33076 Pompano Beach
220%
33316 Fort Lauderdale
204%
33071 Coral Springs
185%
33334 Fort Lauderdale
179%
33327 Fort Lauderdale
160%
33065 Coral Springs
158%
33067 Pompano Beach
158%
33308 Fort Lauderdale
158%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
33311 Fort Lauderdale
47%
33068 Pompano Beach
51%
33321 Fort Lauderdale
51%
33025 Hollywood
55%
33029 Hollywood
61%
33312 Fort Lauderdale
64%
33064 Pompano Beach
66%
33317 Fort Lauderdale
67%
33024 Hollywood
69%
33060 Pompano Beach
70%
33028 Pembroke Pines
90%
33309 Fort Lauderdale
93%
33314 Fort Lauderdale
94%
33027 Hollywood
111%
33063 Pompano Beach
112%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few gyms may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = gyms per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersGyms Per 10kIndexStatus
33073Pompano Beach 33,83818,052 16 3.7 364% Very high density
33326Fort Lauderdale 33,88014,023 14 3.4 334% Very high density
33304Fort Lauderdale 18,33212,419 8 3.3 318% Very high density
33324Fort Lauderdale 50,15129,523 21 3.2 315% Very high density
33305Fort Lauderdale 13,2434,962 5 3.2 310% Very high density
33062Pompano Beach 24,92010,013 8 2.7 260% Very high density
33301Fort Lauderdale 19,50325,222 8 2.5 243% High density
33076Pompano Beach 44,9227,612 11 2.3 220% High density
33316Fort Lauderdale 12,43722,799 5 2.1 204% High density
33071Coral Springs 42,25510,431 9 1.9 185% High density
33334Fort Lauderdale 30,93514,346 7 1.8 179% High density
33327Fort Lauderdale 23,2032,339 4 1.6 160% High density
33065Coral Springs 58,91617,579 11 1.6 158% High density
33067Pompano Beach 27,1887,321 5 1.6 158% High density
33308Fort Lauderdale 27,93518,340 6 1.6 158% High density
33328Fort Lauderdale 28,8519,669 5 1.5 145% Above average
33021Hollywood 48,46429,556 9 1.4 139% Above average
33441Deerfield Beach 30,15312,252 5 1.4 134% Above average
33442Deerfield Beach 31,29624,885 6 1.4 134% Above average
33325Fort Lauderdale 32,39910,182 5 1.3 130% Above average
33323Fort Lauderdale 23,58930,886 5 1.3 125% Above average
33331Fort Lauderdale 24,89716,284 4 1.2 118% Above average
33020Hollywood 46,32224,027 7 1.2 117% Above average
33009Hallandale 44,50212,463 6 1.2 115% Above average
33351Fort Lauderdale 36,36411,954 5 1.2 115% Above average
33063Pompano Beach 55,46610,563 7 1.2 112% Above average
33027Hollywood 65,11627,144 9 1.1 111% Above average
33314Fort Lauderdale 31,06720,648 4 1.0 94% Below average
33309Fort Lauderdale 37,47551,402 6 0.9 93% Below average
33028Pembroke Pines 28,3977,822 3 0.9 90% Below average
33060Pompano Beach 37,2339,583 3 0.7 70% Below average
33024Hollywood 76,58515,650 6 0.7 69% Below average
33317Fort Lauderdale 37,95011,827 3 0.7 67% Below average
33064Pompano Beach 64,56317,834 5 0.7 66% Below average
33312Fort Lauderdale 52,79816,764 4 0.7 64% Below average
33029Hollywood 44,0707,762 3 0.6 61% Below average
33025Hollywood 76,96723,199 5 0.6 55% Below average
33321Fort Lauderdale 51,21611,152 3 0.5 51% Below average
33068Pompano Beach 54,4395,223 3 0.5 51% Below average
33311Fort Lauderdale 74,89814,386 4 0.5 47% Far below average
33004Dania 17,09414,482 0–2 — — Not published
33008Hallandale —95 0–2 — — Not published
33019Hollywood 14,2933,961 0–2 — — Not published
33022Hollywood 0149 0–2 — — Not published
33023Hollywood 72,3449,432 0–2 — — Not published
33026Hollywood 31,1728,658 0–2 — — Not published
33061Pompano Beach —26 0–2 — — Not published
33066Pompano Beach 16,719820 0–2 — — Not published
33069Pompano Beach 29,14529,283 0–2 — — Not published
33074Pompano Beach —23 0–2 — — Not published
33075Coral Springs —26 0–2 — — Not published
33077Pompano Beach —32 0–2 — — Not published
33081Hollywood —22 0–2 — — Not published
33082Pembroke Pines —38 0–2 — — Not published
33084Hollywood —47 0–2 — — Not published
33093Margate —33 0–2 — — Not published
33097Coconut Creek —155 0–2 — — Not published
33302Fort Lauderdale —27 0–2 — — Not published
33303Fort Lauderdale —6 0–2 — — Not published
33306Fort Lauderdale 2,9784,715 0–2 — — Not published
33307Fort Lauderdale —21 0–2 — — Not published
33310Fort Lauderdale —166 0–2 — — Not published
33313Fort Lauderdale 62,8078,552 0–2 — — Not published
33315Fort Lauderdale 13,64521,304 0–2 — — Not published
33318Fort Lauderdale —25 0–2 — — Not published
33319Fort Lauderdale 54,4506,837 0–2 — — Not published
33320Fort Lauderdale —266 0–2 — — Not published
33322Fort Lauderdale 41,12811,050 0–2 — — Not published
33329Fort Lauderdale —62 0–2 — — Not published
33330Fort Lauderdale 13,6994,961 0–2 — — Not published
33332Fort Lauderdale 10,9202,482 0–2 — — Not published
33335Fort Lauderdale —143 0–2 — — Not published
33337Fort Lauderdale —7 0–2 — — Not published
33338Fort Lauderdale —23 0–2 — — Not published
33339Fort Lauderdale —35 0–2 — — Not published
33345Fort Lauderdale —58 0–2 — — Not published
33346Fort Lauderdale —37 0–2 — — Not published
33355Fort Lauderdale —30 0–2 — — Not published
33359Fort Lauderdale —54 0–2 — — Not published
33388Plantation 01,162 0–2 — — Not published
33394Fort Lauderdale —2,947 0–2 — — Not published
33443Deerfield Beach —28 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Fort Lauderdale

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Fort Lauderdale retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Fort Lauderdale retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Fort Lauderdale retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Broward County and gyms

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 713940 — fitness & recreational sports centers (gyms). Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. BLS QCEW (quarterly) is newer than ZBP — 2026 Q1 shows 331 establishments county-wide for this industry. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (1.03 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.