BizGapMap

Home / Fitness & recreational sports centers / Pennsylvania / Montgomery County, PA

Montgomery County, PA — Gyms Saturation

How many gyms exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 74 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Gyms & fitness centers · CrossFit boxes · Boxing, martial arts & dance studios · Recreational sports centers. Counted together because official statistics use one 713940 code.

Measured density: High density — 1.52× the U.S. rate (between 1.52× and 2.05× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 45 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 31 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

Range spans the U.S. rate   Montgomery County gyms — 152–205% of the U.S. rate

177 gyms are counted in Montgomery County — 1.6 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 152% of the U.S. rate of 1.0.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has risen 20% between 2015 and 2023 (126 → 151). That set is smaller than today's county total. 2020–2021 were pandemic-distorted, and Census rounds counts, so small moves are within noise.

Measured supply density is highest in 19095 (Wyncote), 19003 (Ardmore), 19405 (Bridgeport) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 19038 (Glenside), 19446 (Lansdale), 19454 (North Wales).

BLS QCEW puts the latest county-wide count (2026 Q1) at 217 establishments, the freshest available signal.

Measured density: Montgomery County sits at 152% of the U.S. rate for gyms. 31 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 152% and 205% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 19095 and 19003; the lowest measured density is in 19038 and 19446.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing gyms and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Gyms
177–267
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (45 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
1.6
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
1.0
per 10,000 present
County index
1.52×
vs. U.S.
Latest quarter (QCEW)
217
2026 Q1 — county total
Residents
863,513
60 ZIPs with data
Workers
543,597
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
879,190
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
+2.6%
+22,290 people
Net migration 2024
+6,959
international +5,822, domestic +1,137
Jobs located here
536,591
LODES 2022, +1.3% since 2019

Montgomery County had an estimated 879,190 residents on July 1, 2024 — 2.6% more than in 2020 (+22,290). In the latest year it gained 7,517 people: births minus deaths +564, international migration +5,822, domestic migration +1,137. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

536,591 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (+1.3% since 2019), and 429,907 employed residents lived there (+0.5% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
19034 Fort Washington
+28.0%
19025 Dresher
+26.7%
19406 King Of Prussia
+20.9%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
19403 Norristown
−5.5%

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses

Not shown. NES 2024 does not publish fitness and recreational sports centers (NAICS 71394); only the broader recreation group (7139) is available.

Census Nonemployer Statistics 2024 (NAICS 2022). We do not approximate this figure.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more gyms in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — up 20% since 2015

Number of gyms in Montgomery County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

126
2015
143
2018
147
2020
139
2021
146
2022
151
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
19095 Wyncote
504%
19003 Ardmore
494%
19405 Bridgeport
463%
19428 Conshohocken
291%
19046 Jenkintown
279%
19004 Bala Cynwyd
274%
19002 Ambler
263%
19464 Pottstown
250%
18964 Souderton
236%
19468 Royersford
207%
19096 Wynnewood
201%
19440 Hatfield
188%
19462 Plymouth Meeting
184%
19044 Horsham
183%
19401 Norristown
178%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
19038 Glenside
81%
19446 Lansdale
96%
19454 North Wales
100%
19422 Blue Bell
141%
19426 Collegeville
150%
19090 Willow Grove
150%
19040 Hatboro
159%
19006 Huntingdon Valley
162%
19027 Elkins Park
169%
19001 Abington
172%
19403 Norristown
175%
19401 Norristown
178%
19044 Horsham
183%
19462 Plymouth Meeting
184%
19440 Hatfield
188%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few gyms may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

Employment hubs & destinations

These ZIPs have far more workers (or visitors) than residents, so their counts are driven by daytime and visitor demand — not a place to read "shortage" from resident numbers alone.

ZIPNeighborhoodType ResidentsWorkersGymsIndex
19477Spring House Destination 1364,028 4 1812%
19034Fort Washington Employment hub 7,48822,517 3 156%
19406King Of Prussia Employment hub 30,36269,749 4 60%
18936Montgomeryville Destination 2966,164 0–2 —
19456Oaks Destination 2867,290 0–2 —
19474Skippack Employment hub 2221,862 0–2 —
19490Worcester Employment hub 5072,972 0–2 —

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = gyms per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersGyms Per 10kIndexStatus
19477Spring House 1364,028 4 18.6 1812% Very high density
19095Wyncote 8,0303,285 5 5.2 504% Very high density
19003Ardmore 14,2557,001 9 5.1 494% Very high density
19405Bridgeport 5,1452,337 3 4.8 463% Very high density
19428Conshohocken 20,41132,718 11 3.0 291% Very high density
19046Jenkintown 19,64016,617 8 2.9 279% Very high density
19004Bala Cynwyd 11,23020,212 6 2.8 274% Very high density
19002Ambler 32,1289,704 10 2.7 263% Very high density
19464Pottstown 49,10118,780 15 2.6 250% High density
18964Souderton 14,54612,113 5 2.4 236% High density
19468Royersford 28,1949,581 7 2.1 207% High density
19096Wynnewood 15,2498,232 4 2.1 201% High density
19440Hatfield 19,43112,863 5 1.9 188% High density
19462Plymouth Meeting 16,33120,161 5 1.9 184% High density
19044Horsham 17,27929,422 6 1.9 183% High density
19401Norristown 43,35911,602 9 1.8 178% High density
19403Norristown 44,01723,458 10 1.8 175% High density
19001Abington 17,8679,649 4 1.8 172% High density
19027Elkins Park 20,4205,315 4 1.7 169% High density
19006Huntingdon Valley 23,44313,259 5 1.7 162% High density
19040Hatboro 22,0784,982 4 1.6 159% High density
19034Fort Washington 7,48822,517 3 1.6 156% High density
19090Willow Grove 19,66212,571 4 1.5 150% High density
19426Collegeville 43,46017,285 8 1.5 150% Above average
19422Blue Bell 20,41228,120 5 1.5 141% Above average
19454North Wales 27,75522,257 4 1.0 100% Above average
19446Lansdale 61,84818,471 7 1.0 96% Below average
19038Glenside 32,2967,672 3 0.8 81% Below average
19406King Of Prussia 30,36269,749 4 0.6 60% Below average
18041East Greenville 5,7682,579 0–2 — — Not published
18054Green Lane 4,932524 0–2 — — Not published
18070Palm 223245 0–2 — — Not published
18073Pennsburg 11,7552,451 0–2 — — Not published
18074Perkiomenville 5,590733 0–2 — — Not published
18076Red Hill 2,833709 0–2 — — Not published
18084Sumneytown —46 0–2 — — Not published
18915Colmar 1,6483,060 0–2 — — Not published
18918Earlington —39 0–2 — — Not published
18936Montgomeryville 2966,164 0–2 — — Not published
18969Telford 15,2455,447 0–2 — — Not published
18971Tylersport —113 0–2 — — Not published
18979Woxall —25 0–2 — — Not published
19009Bryn Athyn 1,124810 0–2 — — Not published
19012Cheltenham 6,910645 0–2 — — Not published
19025Dresher 7,4233,647 0–2 — — Not published
19031Flourtown 4,9292,472 0–2 — — Not published
19035Gladwyne 3,9371,221 0–2 — — Not published
19041Haverford 6,3083,824 0–2 — — Not published
19066Merion Station 5,8391,484 0–2 — — Not published
19072Narberth 10,1292,319 0–2 — — Not published
19075Oreland 7,384791 0–2 — — Not published
19404Norristown —453 0–2 — — Not published
19407Audubon —49 0–2 — — Not published
19408Eagleville —380 0–2 — — Not published
19409Fairview Village —119 0–2 — — Not published
19423Cedars —306 0–2 — — Not published
19430Creamery —32 0–2 — — Not published
19435Frederick 7533 0–2 — — Not published
19436Gwynedd 435443 0–2 — — Not published
19437Gwynedd Valley 531998 0–2 — — Not published
19438Harleysville 25,4387,962 0–2 — — Not published
19443Kulpsville —1,746 0–2 — — Not published
19444Lafayette Hill 11,0653,702 0–2 — — Not published
19450Lederach —102 0–2 — — Not published
19453Mont Clare 1,259162 0–2 — — Not published
19456Oaks 2867,290 0–2 — — Not published
19472Sassamansville 5432 0–2 — — Not published
19473Schwenksville 17,2591,562 0–2 — — Not published
19474Skippack 2221,862 0–2 — — Not published
19478Spring Mount —282 0–2 — — Not published
19486West Point —6,420 0–2 — — Not published
19490Worcester 5072,972 0–2 — — Not published
19492Zieglerville 811602 0–2 — — Not published
19525Gilbertsville 17,7252,891 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in King Of Prussia

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse King Of Prussia retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse King Of Prussia retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse King Of Prussia retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Montgomery County and gyms

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 713940 — fitness & recreational sports centers (gyms). Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. BLS QCEW (quarterly) is newer than ZBP — 2026 Q1 shows 217 establishments county-wide for this industry. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (1.03 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.