BizGapMap

Home / Full-service restaurants / Florida / Seminole County, FL

Seminole County, FL — Restaurants Saturation

How many restaurants exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 24 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Sit-down restaurants with table service. Counted together because official statistics use one 722511 code.

Measured density: Above average — 1.03× the U.S. rate (between 1.03× and 1.04× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 13 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 2 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

In line with the U.S. rate   Seminole County restaurants — 103–104% of the U.S. rate

350 restaurants are counted in Seminole County — 6.6 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 103% of the U.S. rate of 6.4.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has risen 8% between 2015 and 2023 (324 → 350). That set is smaller than today's county total. 2020–2021 were pandemic-distorted, and Census rounds counts, so small moves are within noise.

Measured supply density is highest in 32746 (Lake Mary), 32750 (Longwood), 32714 (Altamonte Springs) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 32779 (Longwood), 32708 (Winter Springs), 32773 (Sanford).

BLS QCEW puts the latest county-wide count (2026 Q1) at 425 establishments, the freshest available signal.

Measured density: Seminole County sits at 103% of the U.S. rate for restaurants. 2 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 103% and 104% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 32746 and 32750; the lowest measured density is in 32779 and 32708.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing restaurants and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Restaurants
350–376
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (13 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
6.6
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
6.4
per 10,000 present
County index
1.03×
vs. U.S.
Latest quarter (QCEW)
425
2026 Q1 — county total
Residents
441,429
13 ZIPs with data
Workers
185,405
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
494,605
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
+4.9%
+23,133 people
Net migration 2024
+4,764
international +6,844, domestic −2,080
Jobs located here
221,011
LODES 2022, +3.2% since 2019

Seminole County had an estimated 494,605 residents on July 1, 2024 — 4.9% more than in 2020 (+23,133). In the latest year it gained 5,351 people: births minus deaths +571, international migration +6,844, domestic migration −2,080. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

221,011 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (+3.2% since 2019), and 227,373 employed residents lived there (+0.2% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
32771 Sanford
+11.3%
32707 Casselberry
+9.6%
32708 Winter Springs
+8.0%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change

No ZIP had a statistically significant decrease.

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses (no paid employees)

Nonemployer businesses
114
no paid employees (2024)
Receipts
$4.3M
published gross receipts
Receipts per business
$38K
gross, not profit

Census Nonemployer Statistics counts businesses with no paid employees — a separate universe from the employer establishments counted above; a business is in one or the other, never both. They are not storefronts by definition: many are home-based, mobile, or part-time.

We show them beside the density index, not inside it. In categories such as nail and beauty salons, child care, and pet care, one-person businesses can outnumber employer establishments, so the employer-only count understates how many businesses exist. That is not evidence of higher demand.

Receipts are gross revenue reported for these businesses — not profit, and not the size of the local market. Census publishes this only at county level, so it is not shown on the ZIP map. See methodology.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more restaurants in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — up 8% since 2015

Number of restaurants in Seminole County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

324
2015
318
2018
332
2020
333
2021
340
2022
350
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
32746 Lake Mary
152%
32750 Longwood
137%
32714 Altamonte Springs
119%
32765 Oviedo
115%
32701 Altamonte Springs
113%
32730 Casselberry
111%
32771 Sanford
110%
32707 Casselberry
86%
32773 Sanford
77%
32708 Winter Springs
68%
32779 Longwood
59%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
32779 Longwood
59%
32708 Winter Springs
68%
32773 Sanford
77%
32707 Casselberry
86%
32771 Sanford
110%
32730 Casselberry
111%
32701 Altamonte Springs
113%
32765 Oviedo
115%
32714 Altamonte Springs
119%
32750 Longwood
137%
32746 Lake Mary
152%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few restaurants may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = restaurants per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersRestaurants Per 10kIndexStatus
32746Lake Mary 46,68444,473 67 9.7 152% High density
32750Longwood 26,16418,424 31 8.8 137% Above average
32714Altamonte Springs 37,90524,050 38 7.6 119% Above average
32765Oviedo 64,47718,430 54 7.3 115% Above average
32701Altamonte Springs 24,59214,693 23 7.2 113% Above average
32730Casselberry 6,0911,971 5 7.1 111% Above average
32771Sanford 62,60628,944 54 7.0 110% Above average
32707Casselberry 39,4938,766 24 5.5 86% Below average
32773Sanford 34,0329,203 19 4.9 77% Below average
32708Winter Springs 48,9658,084 23 4.3 68% Below average
32779Longwood 28,9246,233 12 3.7 59% Below average
32715Altamonte Springs —90 0–2 — — Not published
32716Altamonte Springs —87 0–2 — — Not published
32718Casselberry —17 0–2 — — Not published
32719Winter Springs —35 0–2 — — Not published
32732Geneva 5,275691 0–2 — — Not published
32733Goldenrod —65 0–2 — — Not published
32747Lake Monroe —119 0–2 — — Not published
32752Longwood —141 0–2 — — Not published
32762Oviedo —167 0–2 — — Not published
32766Oviedo 16,2211,443 0–2 — — Not published
32772Sanford —371 0–2 — — Not published
32791Longwood —15 0–2 — — Not published
32795Lake Mary —62 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Lake Mary

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Lake Mary retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Lake Mary retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Lake Mary retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Seminole County and restaurants

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 722511 — full-service restaurants. Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. BLS QCEW (quarterly) is newer than ZBP — 2026 Q1 shows 425 establishments county-wide for this industry. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (6.39 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.