BizGapMap

Home / Full-service restaurants / Wisconsin / Milwaukee County, WI

Milwaukee County, WI — Restaurants Saturation

How many restaurants exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 39 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Sit-down restaurants with table service. Counted together because official statistics use one 722511 code.

Measured density: Below average — 0.93× the U.S. rate (between 0.93× and 0.94× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 7 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 4 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

In line with the U.S. rate   Milwaukee County restaurants — 93–94% of the U.S. rate

679 restaurants are counted in Milwaukee County — 5.9 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 93% of the U.S. rate of 6.4.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has stayed roughly flat between 2015 and 2023 (653 → 672).

Measured supply density is highest in 53130 (Hales Corners), 53207 (Milwaukee), 53204 (Milwaukee) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 53224 (Milwaukee), 53216 (Milwaukee), 53225 (Milwaukee).

BLS QCEW puts the latest county-wide count (2026 Q1) at 682 establishments, the freshest available signal.

Measured density: Milwaukee County sits at 93% of the U.S. rate for restaurants. 4 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 93% and 94% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 53130 and 53207; the lowest measured density is in 53224 and 53216.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing restaurants and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Restaurants
679–693
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (7 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
5.9
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
6.4
per 10,000 present
County index
0.93×
vs. U.S.
Latest quarter (QCEW)
682
2026 Q1 — county total
Residents
926,469
36 ZIPs with data
Workers
431,861
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
924,740
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
−1.5%
−13,869 people
Net migration 2024
+524
international +6,128, domestic −5,604
Jobs located here
494,913
LODES 2022, −3.2% since 2019

Milwaukee County had an estimated 924,740 residents on July 1, 2024 — 1.5% fewer than in 2020 (−13,869). In the latest year it gained 2,880 people: births minus deaths +2,340, international migration +6,128, domestic migration −5,604. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

494,913 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (−3.2% since 2019), and 447,642 employed residents lived there (−2.3% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
53154 Oak Creek
+3.5%
53129 Greendale
+3.0%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
53235 Saint Francis
−5.4%
53172 South Milwaukee
−2.5%
53110 Cudahy
−2.3%

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses (no paid employees)

Nonemployer businesses
149
no paid employees (2024)
Receipts
$8.1M
published gross receipts
Receipts per business
$55K
gross, not profit

Census Nonemployer Statistics counts businesses with no paid employees — a separate universe from the employer establishments counted above; a business is in one or the other, never both. They are not storefronts by definition: many are home-based, mobile, or part-time.

We show them beside the density index, not inside it. In categories such as nail and beauty salons, child care, and pet care, one-person businesses can outnumber employer establishments, so the employer-only count understates how many businesses exist. That is not evidence of higher demand.

Receipts are gross revenue reported for these businesses — not profit, and not the size of the local market. Census publishes this only at county level, so it is not shown on the ZIP map. See methodology.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more restaurants in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — up 3% since 2015

Number of restaurants in Milwaukee County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

653
2015
666
2018
675
2020
667
2021
678
2022
672
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
53130 Hales Corners
202%
53207 Milwaukee
170%
53204 Milwaukee
170%
53213 Milwaukee
157%
53214 Milwaukee
134%
53220 Milwaukee
126%
53211 Milwaukee
116%
53129 Greendale
115%
53217 Milwaukee
106%
53227 Milwaukee
102%
53110 Cudahy
100%
53222 Milwaukee
89%
53221 Milwaukee
87%
53154 Oak Creek
83%
53219 Milwaukee
78%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
53224 Milwaukee
16%
53216 Milwaukee
19%
53225 Milwaukee
22%
53223 Milwaukee
25%
53218 Milwaukee
25%
53209 Milwaukee
27%
53228 Milwaukee
45%
53235 Saint Francis
63%
53172 South Milwaukee
63%
53215 Milwaukee
64%
53132 Franklin
66%
53212 Milwaukee
66%
53233 Milwaukee
70%
53208 Milwaukee
75%
53219 Milwaukee
78%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few restaurants may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

Employment hubs & destinations

These ZIPs have far more workers (or visitors) than residents, so their counts are driven by daytime and visitor demand — not a place to read "shortage" from resident numbers alone.

ZIPNeighborhoodType ResidentsWorkersRestaurantsIndex
53203Milwaukee Employment hub 2,3579,390 25 555%
53202Milwaukee Employment hub 25,86151,757 109 330%
53226Milwaukee Employment hub 18,90840,117 18 72%
53295Milwaukee Destination 903,528 0–2 —

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = restaurants per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersRestaurants Per 10kIndexStatus
53203Milwaukee 2,3579,390 25 35.5 555% Very high density
53202Milwaukee 25,86151,757 109 21.1 330% Very high density
53130Hales Corners 7,7123,195 12 12.9 202% High density
53207Milwaukee 34,31314,103 45 10.9 170% High density
53204Milwaukee 39,99616,037 52 10.8 170% High density
53213Milwaukee 26,9058,035 31 10.0 157% High density
53214Milwaukee 34,48022,003 39 8.6 134% Above average
53220Milwaukee 27,7826,332 25 8.1 126% Above average
53211Milwaukee 34,2347,064 28 7.4 116% Above average
53129Greendale 14,5703,425 12 7.4 115% Above average
53217Milwaukee 29,95710,923 24 6.8 106% Above average
53227Milwaukee 22,88512,689 19 6.5 102% Above average
53110Cudahy 17,8537,967 14 6.4 100% Above average
53222Milwaukee 24,66310,757 17 5.7 89% Below average
53221Milwaukee 38,04410,083 24 5.6 87% Below average
53154Oak Creek 37,32523,534 26 5.3 83% Below average
53219Milwaukee 34,7646,441 19 5.0 78% Below average
53208Milwaukee 27,20112,775 16 4.8 75% Below average
53226Milwaukee 18,90840,117 18 4.6 72% Below average
53233Milwaukee 14,49715,728 10 4.5 70% Below average
53212Milwaukee 28,93822,190 17 4.2 66% Below average
53132Franklin 35,43314,643 18 4.2 66% Below average
53215Milwaukee 58,14619,618 28 4.1 64% Below average
53172South Milwaukee 20,4423,491 9 4.1 63% Below average
53235Saint Francis 9,0041,928 4 4.0 63% Below average
53228Milwaukee 15,1214,526 5 2.9 45% Far below average
53209Milwaukee 45,17014,979 9 1.7 27% Far below average
53218Milwaukee 41,1964,306 7 1.6 25% Far below average
53223Milwaukee 28,79317,127 6 1.6 25% Far below average
53225Milwaukee 25,1876,587 4 1.4 22% Far below average
53216Milwaukee 30,3454,785 4 1.2 19% Far below average
53224Milwaukee 21,22315,117 3 1.0 16% Far below average
53201Milwaukee —2,763 0–2 — — Not published
53205Milwaukee 9,2651,460 0–2 — — Not published
53206Milwaukee 19,8871,319 0–2 — — Not published
53210Milwaukee 23,9223,902 0–2 — — Not published
53234Milwaukee —105 0–2 — — Not published
53237Milwaukee —26 0–2 — — Not published
53295Milwaukee 903,528 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Milwaukee

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Milwaukee retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Milwaukee retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Milwaukee retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Milwaukee County and restaurants

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 722511 — full-service restaurants. Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. BLS QCEW (quarterly) is newer than ZBP — 2026 Q1 shows 682 establishments county-wide for this industry. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (6.39 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.