BizGapMap

Home / Full-service restaurants / Massachusetts / Hampshire County, MA

Hampshire County, MA — Restaurants Saturation

How many restaurants exist per person present — residents plus daytime workers — by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Establishment data: Census ZBP 2023. Population: ACS 2024 5-year. 28 ZIP codes analyzed.

Includes: Sit-down restaurants with table service. Counted together because official statistics use one 722511 code.

Measured density: Above average — 1.05× the U.S. rate (between 1.05× and 1.31× once withheld ZIP cells are counted)

Why a range: Census does not publish a ZIP-by-industry count when that ZIP has 0–2 businesses. 18 ZIP cells in this county are withheld, 15 of them with residents. Each could hold 0, 1, or 2 businesses: counting them all as 0 gives the low end, counting them all as 2 gives the high end — the data cannot say where the truth sits. The density range uses only the populated cells, since ZIPs without residents are excluded from per-person rates. How ranges work

Range spans the U.S. rate   Hampshire County restaurants — 105–131% of the U.S. rate

124 restaurants are counted in Hampshire County — 6.7 per 10,000 people present (residents + daytime workers), 105% of the U.S. rate of 6.4.

On the comparable ZIP set (ZIPs with a published count in every year), the total has fallen 17% between 2015 and 2023 (146 → 121). That set is smaller than today's county total. 2020–2021 were pandemic-distorted, and Census rounds counts, so small moves are within noise.

Measured supply density is highest in 01035 (Hadley), 01060 (Northampton), 01002 (Amherst) — well above the national rate. On measured density alone, the lowest-density residential ZIPs with a published count are 01082 (Ware), 01007 (Belchertown), 01073 (Southampton).

BLS QCEW puts the latest county-wide count (2026 Q1) at 138 establishments, the freshest available signal.

Measured density: Hampshire County sits at 105% of the U.S. rate for restaurants. 15 ZIPs with population have no published count (each 0–2 businesses), so the true per-capita rate is between 105% and 131% of the U.S. rate. Why. The highest measured density is in 01035 and 01060; the lowest measured density is in 01082 and 01007.

This is a supply-side read: it counts existing restaurants and the people present, not foot traffic, income, rent, or whether locals want more. Treat low density as a question to check, not an answer.

Restaurants
124–160
published count; upper bound counts each withheld ZIP cell as 2 (18 cells) (2023)
Per 10,000 present
6.7
residents + daytime workers
U.S. average
6.4
per 10,000 present
County index
1.05×
vs. U.S.
Latest quarter (QCEW)
138
2026 Q1 — county total
Residents
161,056
25 ZIPs with data
Workers
46,046
jobs located in county

Is the area growing?

Population
165,399
Census PEP, July 1 2024
Change since 2020
+11.3%
+16,810 people
Net migration 2024
+232
international +1,198, domestic −966
Jobs located here
67,991
LODES 2022, −0.1% since 2019

Hampshire County had an estimated 165,399 residents on July 1, 2024 — 11.3% more than in 2020 (+16,810). In the latest year it lost 287 people: births minus deaths −529, international migration +1,198, domestic migration −966. Components are published separately and may not sum exactly.

67,991 jobs were located in the county in 2022 (−0.1% since 2019), and 66,798 employed residents lived there (−4.5% since 2019). LODES counts wage and salary jobs covered by unemployment insurance plus federal jobs; it excludes the self-employed and military, and counts jobs rather than unique people. 2019→2022 spans the pandemic, so read it as one change, not a trend.

Population and migration say whether the customer base is growing. They do not say whether people want another business of this type. Definitions and limits →  ·  Full county detail →

ZIP gaining residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
01003 Amherst
+19.0%
01007 Belchertown
+2.8%
01073 Southampton
+1.4%
ZIP losing residents
2015–19 → 2020–24
Change
01002 Amherst
−12.1%
01033 Granby
−3.8%

ACS 5-year estimates for 2015–2019 and 2020–2024. Only ZIPs with at least 2,000 residents in both windows and a change larger than the survey margin of error (90%) are listed — small ZIPs move a lot on paper without a real signal.

Nonemployer businesses (no paid employees)

Nonemployer businesses
13
no paid employees (2024)
Receipts
$424K
published gross receipts
Receipts per business
$33K
gross, not profit

Census Nonemployer Statistics counts businesses with no paid employees — a separate universe from the employer establishments counted above; a business is in one or the other, never both. They are not storefronts by definition: many are home-based, mobile, or part-time.

We show them beside the density index, not inside it. In categories such as nail and beauty salons, child care, and pet care, one-person businesses can outnumber employer establishments, so the employer-only count understates how many businesses exist. That is not evidence of higher demand.

Receipts are gross revenue reported for these businesses — not profit, and not the size of the local market. Census publishes this only at county level, so it is not shown on the ZIP map. See methodology.

Saturation map

Each ZIP area is shaded by its density of this business type per person present (residents + workers) vs. the U.S. average. Click any ZIP to zoom to its boundary, see its numbers, and switch to aerial imagery. Individual mapped shops appear as dots at street level — Show locations zooms you in to them (scroll or double-click to zoom).

Basemap:
Under 50% 50–100% 100–150% 150–250% 250%+ 0–2 (not published) / no data ZIP total (dot size) Mapped shop (OpenStreetMap, street level)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, tiles by OpenFreeMap.

White dots are ZIP totals from the official Census count — the bigger the dot, the more restaurants in that ZIP. They are aggregated, not individual shops. Turquoise dots are individual locations mapped in OpenStreetMap, shown only at street level; they are crowd-sourced and indicative, may be incomplete, and do not equal the official counts. Only the official ZIP totals feed the saturation index.

Market trend — down 17% since 2015

Number of restaurants in Hampshire County across 2015–2023, on a consistent set of ZIP codes present in every year — so changes are real, not ZIP-boundary artifacts. 2015/2018 are pre-pandemic baselines; 2020/2021 are COVID-distorted.

146
2015
146
2018
130
2020
124
2021
136
2022
121
2023

Highest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
01035 Hadley
235%
01060 Northampton
217%
01002 Amherst
160%
01027 Easthampton
111%
01075 South Hadley
102%
01062 Florence
88%
01073 Southampton
69%
01007 Belchertown
67%
01082 Ware
55%

Lowest measured density

ZIP
vs. U.S. average
Index
01082 Ware
55%
01007 Belchertown
67%
01073 Southampton
69%
01062 Florence
88%
01075 South Hadley
102%
01027 Easthampton
111%
01002 Amherst
160%
01060 Northampton
217%
01035 Hadley
235%
Low measured density is not evidence of opportunity. A ZIP with few restaurants may simply lack foot traffic, retail space, or demand. We rank only residential and mixed ZIPs here; employment hubs and visitor destinations are listed separately below. ZIPs where Census did not publish a count (0–2 businesses) are not ranked: they may be the least served of all, but the data cannot tell 0 from 1 or 2. Verify those locally.

All ZIP codes

Click a column header to sort. Index = restaurants per 10,000 people present (residents + 0.5×workers) ÷ the U.S. average. 100% = exactly average.

ZIPNeighborhood ResidentsWorkersRestaurants Per 10kIndexStatus
01035Hadley 5,3065,356 12 15.0 235% High density
01060Northampton 16,49211,833 31 13.8 217% High density
01002Amherst 26,3707,928 31 10.2 160% High density
01038Hatfield 2,4911,307 3 9.5 149% Above average
01027Easthampton 17,7163,949 14 7.1 111% Above average
01075South Hadley 17,7544,437 13 6.5 102% Above average
01062Florence 9,8161,720 6 5.6 88% Below average
01073Southampton 6,2301,074 3 4.4 69% Below average
01007Belchertown 15,4191,747 7 4.3 67% Below average
01082Ware 10,3922,160 4 3.5 55% Below average
01003Amherst 13,510277 0–2 — — Not published
01004Amherst —33 0–2 — — Not published
01012Chesterfield 39776 0–2 — — Not published
01026Cummington 1,014120 0–2 — — Not published
01032Goshen 509108 0–2 — — Not published
01033Granby 6,080732 0–2 — — Not published
01039Haydenville 1,506287 0–2 — — Not published
01050Huntington 2,529221 0–2 — — Not published
01053Leeds 2,3041,693 0–2 — — Not published
01059North Amherst —49 0–2 — — Not published
01061Northampton —118 0–2 — — Not published
01066North Hatfield 11559 0–2 — — Not published
01070Plainfield 57529 0–2 — — Not published
01084West Chesterfield 9739 0–2 — — Not published
01088West Hatfield 702506 0–2 — — Not published
01096Williamsburg 2,580237 0–2 — — Not published
01098Worthington 979128 0–2 — — Not published
01243Middlefield 17323 0–2 — — Not published

Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.

Find an actual space in Northampton

The numbers above tell you how the market looks. To find a specific storefront, these marketplaces list available retail space for lease.

LoopNet
Largest commercial marketplace
Browse Northampton retail space →
Crexi
Free listings + market data
Browse Northampton retail space →
CityFeet
Retail space for lease
Browse Northampton retail space →

Open vacancy data (actual empty units) is only published by some cities; where it exists we show it directly. Listings above are third-party.

Census withholds some ZIP-by-industry cells to protect small businesses. 0–2 means the cell was not published (Census publishes industry counts only at 3+ per ZIP), so the ZIP is left unranked rather than counted as zero. ~ means the count is estimated from the broader industry group and can be off by a business or two.

Follow Hampshire County and restaurants

When a data vintage changes or a section of this report is revised, we post it to a public update feed. No email address, no account, no tracking — and nothing is sent unless something actually changed.

Subscribe to updates (RSS) How these numbers are built →

Methodology & sources

Establishments. U.S. Census ZIP Code Business Patterns (ZBP 2023), NAICS 722511 — full-service restaurants. Counts establishments with paid employees. ZBP is published annually with a ~2-year lag.

Fresh county signal. BLS QCEW (quarterly) is newer than ZBP — 2026 Q1 shows 138 establishments county-wide for this industry. It cannot be broken down by ZIP.

Population. U.S. Census American Community Survey 2024 5-year ZCTA population (table B01003). Workers are the ZIP's total employment from the same 2023 ZBP file.

Demand ("people present"). Demand comes from residents and daytime workers: residents + 0.5 × workers. This is the single documented assumption in the model and can be tuned.

Index. index = (ZIP establishments ÷ ZIP demand × 10,000) ÷ the U.S. average for this industry (6.39 per 10,000 present). It is a supply-side density measure; it does not capture income, rent, tourism, or whether locals actually want more.

Read the full methodology →  ·  Data sources & vintages →

BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.