Home / Full-service restaurants / Texas
How many restaurants exist per person present (residents + daytime workers) across the 36 Texas counties we cover, by ZIP code, compared with the U.S. average. Data: Census ZBP 2023 + ACS 2024 + BLS QCEW.
Includes: Sit-down restaurants with table service. Counted together because official statistics use one 722511 code.
| City | County | Restaurants | Residents | Workers | Per 10k | Index | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corpus Christi | Nueces County | 308–348 | 351,950 | 130,507 | 7.4 | 116–122% | Above average |
| League City | Galveston County | 315–335 | 379,923 | 101,205 | 7.3 | 115–118% | Above average |
| Frisco | Denton County | 790–808 | 978,658 | 345,999 | 6.9 | 107–108% | Above average |
| Austin | Travis County | 1,126–1,184 | 1,302,098 | 733,329 | 6.7 | 106–107% | Above average |
| El Paso | El Paso County | 662–696 | 871,270 | 253,085 | 6.6 | 104–106% | Above average |
| Amarillo | Randall County | 109–113 | 144,098 | 41,104 | 6.6 | 104–106% | Above average |
| Plano | Collin County | 825–837 | 1,115,497 | 422,851 | 6.2 | 97–98% | Below average |
| Midland | Midland County | 129–139 | 168,494 | 91,917 | 6.0 | 94% | Below average |
| Dallas | Dallas County | 2,154–2,264 | 2,736,443 | 1,654,497 | 6.0 | 94–94% | Below average |
| Beaumont | Jefferson County | 181–201 | 252,884 | 102,594 | 6.0 | 93–97% | Below average |
| Houston | Harris County | 3,534–3,714 | 4,866,005 | 2,159,333 | 5.9 | 93–94% | Below average |
| San Antonio | Bexar County | 1,442–1,484 | 2,044,549 | 788,736 | 5.9 | 92–93% | Below average |
| New Braunfels | Comal County | 144–148 | 215,245 | 64,040 | 5.8 | 91–92% | Below average |
| Harlingen | Cameron County | 277–295 | 425,007 | 121,999 | 5.7 | 89–92% | Below average |
| Pearland | Brazoria County | 258–274 | 410,979 | 98,139 | 5.6 | 88–90% | Below average |
| Lubbock | Lubbock County | 207–237 | 311,047 | 122,184 | 5.5 | 86–92% | Below average |
| Sugar Land | Fort Bend County | 530–550 | 855,396 | 228,133 | 5.5 | 86–88% | Below average |
| Abilene | Taylor County | 100–122 | 154,753 | 57,557 | 5.4 | 85–97% | Below average |
| Fort Worth | Tarrant County | 1,361–1,411 | 2,091,100 | 824,477 | 5.4 | 85–86% | Below average |
| Spring | Montgomery County | 415–429 | 671,730 | 197,300 | 5.4 | 84–86% | Below average |
| College Station | Brazos County | 149–165 | 241,659 | 78,858 | 5.3 | 83–85% | Below average |
| Odessa | Ector County | 103–115 | 171,416 | 72,071 | 5.0 | 78–81% | Below average |
| Laredo | Webb County | 154–164 | 269,130 | 83,205 | 5.0 | 78–82% | Below average |
| Cedar Park | Williamson County | 379–403 | 691,052 | 187,105 | 4.8 | 76–78% | Below average |
| Tyler | Smith County | 140–168 | 247,103 | 98,064 | 4.7 | 74–85% | Below average |
| Weatherford | Parker County | 77–89 | 147,840 | 33,831 | 4.7 | 73–81% | Below average |
| Schertz | Guadalupe County | 84–96 | 157,840 | 50,580 | 4.6 | 72–79% | Below average |
| Temple | Bell County | 205–227 | 399,960 | 95,282 | 4.6 | 72–76% | Below average |
| San Marcos | Hays County | 148–150 | 286,831 | 81,054 | 4.5 | 71% | Below average |
| Mcallen | Hidalgo County | 451–477 | 891,915 | 226,099 | 4.5 | 70–73% | Below average |
| Woodway | McLennan County | 143–177 | 270,919 | 111,818 | 4.4 | 68–81% | Below average |
| Waxahachie | Ellis County | 107–123 | 222,795 | 52,087 | 4.3 | 67–75% | Below average |
| Wichita Falls | Wichita County | 68–82 | 136,053 | 45,003 | 4.3 | 67–77% | Below average |
| Burleson | Johnson County | 93–103 | 215,467 | 52,226 | 3.8 | 60–65% | Below average |
| Sherman | Grayson County | 64–88 | 148,078 | 43,079 | 3.8 | 59–79% | Range spans bands |
| Terrell | Kaufman County | 65–75 | 183,309 | 36,313 | 3.2 | 51–57% | Well below average |
Scroll the table sideways to see all columns.
← All Full-service restaurants markets nationwide · Methodology · Data sources
BizGapMap — free, no-login small-business saturation reports for major U.S. counties. Built entirely from public U.S. Census, BLS, and IRS data (ZBP 2023, ACS 2024 5-year, PEP 2024, LODES, QCEW, IRS SOI). No forecasts, no revenue guesses — withheld cells are marked, and the few derived counts are labelled as estimates.